Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad in the case Geelen.

Should the first indent of Article 9(2)(c) of the Sixth Directive, or Article 52(a) of the VAT Directive of 2006 (version to 1 January 2010), respectively, be interpreted as also covering the provision, in return for payment, of live interactive erotic webcam sessions?

C-568/17

 

Informatiesoort: Nieuws

Rubriek: Europees belastingrecht, Omzetbelasting

H&I: Previews

3

Gerelateerde artikelen